From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 08:51:57 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ubi: Introduce block devices for UBI volumes Message-ID: <20140209075157.GJ22376@1wt.eu> References: <1391027881-8354-2-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <20140208225149.GA22376@1wt.eu> <52F6B602.3030905@nod.at> <20140208230159.GC22376@1wt.eu> <52F6BA07.60707@nod.at> <20140208231501.GG22376@1wt.eu> <52F6BCCD.5070302@nod.at> <20140208233758.GH22376@1wt.eu> <52F6C916.2030506@nod.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52F6C916.2030506@nod.at> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Mike Frysinger , Artem Bityutskiy , Michael Opdenacker , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Ezequiel Garcia , Piergiorgio Beruto , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 01:17:26AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Also, all these low-level features on top of MTD are used by people > > who try to build systems and who are expected to understand a little > > bit some of the limits of the solutions they use. It's not the basic > > joe user who will install ext4 on top of ubiblock on his NAND by > > himself. > > My experience has shown the opposite. ;-) When these happen, it's most likely because they copy-paste a howto from a blog, so anyway they'll blindly follow whatever appears on the blog including patching their kernel or forcing whatever option :-) > > This I think it's a bad idea to artificially remove some features > > if they're not broken. > > Your arguments have convinced me, let's keep it and hope the best. OK thanks! Willy