From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-zigbee-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: 6lowpan: lockless tx queue of routing netlink device
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 11:20:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140209102047.GA14770@omega> (raw)
Hi,
I got some locking issues with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled and need help.
Full output:
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.13.0-08605-g8f2b630-dirty #105 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
agetty/841 is trying to acquire lock:
(_xmit_IEEE802154#2){+.-...}, at: [<c0356b39>] sch_direct_xmit+0x34/0x122
but task is already holding lock:
(_xmit_IEEE802154#2){+.-...}, at: [<c0346926>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x26e/0x329
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(_xmit_IEEE802154#2);
lock(_xmit_IEEE802154#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
6 locks held by agetty/841:
#0: (((&idev->mc_ifc_timer))){+.-...}, at: [<c012b6f2>] call_timer_fn+0x0/0xb3
#1: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<c03b4335>] rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x21
#2: (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<c039d39d>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x0/0x1c
#3: (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<c03426e5>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x0/0x1c
#4: (_xmit_IEEE802154#2){+.-...}, at: [<c0346926>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x26e/0x329
#5: (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<c03426e5>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x0/0x1c
The solution was for me to change
dev->type = ARPHRD_IEEE802154
to
dev->type = ARPHRD_6LOWPAN
of the rtnl device. What we really shall do in the near future. (I have
a patch for this).
Another solution was to add:
dev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
in setup callback of rtnl device.
This enables a lockless tx queue.
I am not sure if we can do a lockless tx queue here and the comment of
NETIF_F_LLTX says it's deprecated "/* do not use LLTX in new drivers */".
Exists there some alternative for this?
So a little bit more information about the current architecture which is
a little bit complex for tx. Maybe then it's more clear how to fix this
issue correctly.
To setup a lowpan interface you need to run:
"ip link add link $WPAN_INTERFACE name $LOWPAN_INTERFACE type lowpan"
This setups a lowpan interface which "sitting" on top of the
$WPAN_INTERFACE.
The lowpan rtnl implementation saves pointers from both interfaces we
name it:
"real_dev" <-- WPAN_INTERFACE
"dev" <-- LOWPAN_INTERFACE
If we get some "usually" ipv6 packets from LOWPAN_INTERFACE which calls
header_create function, then we doing some manipulating of sk_buff there.
After this we calling dev_hard_header with the callback of
WPAN_INTERFACE to generate the mac header.
Then we are in the xmit callback of LOWPAN_INTERFACE and doing a
skb->dev pointer change from LOWPAN_INTERFACE to the WPAN_INTERFACE and
calling dev_queue_xmit to send it via the WPAN_INTERFACE.
The skb->dev switch is necessary because we call then the xmit callback
of the WPAN_INTERFACE, the LOWPAN_INTERFACE is more a "virtual" interface.
I think that's the problem. We have two dev_queue_xmit calls first from
LOWPAN_INTERFACE then the WPAN_INTERFACE, so we locking something twice.
That's very much complicated and I think we doing some hacked stuff
there but currently it works so (except the locking issue). :-)
- Alex
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-09 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-09 10:20 Alexander Aring [this message]
2014-02-09 12:41 ` 6lowpan: lockless tx queue of routing netlink device Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1391949707.10160.130.camel-XN9IlZ5yJG9HTL0Zs8A6p/gx64E7kk8eUsxypvmhUTTZJqsBc5GL+g@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-10 17:33 ` Alexander Aring
2014-02-10 18:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-02-10 18:21 ` Alexander Aring
2014-02-10 19:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-02-10 19:31 ` Alexander Aring
2014-02-10 19:42 ` [PATCH] 6lowpan: fix lockdep splats Eric Dumazet
2014-02-11 1:51 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140209102047.GA14770@omega \
--to=alex.aring-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-zigbee-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.