All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Zoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@broadcom.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: move SRCU grace period work to power efficient workqueue
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:47:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210184729.GL4250@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F8A51F.4090909@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:08:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Acked-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Thank you all, queued for 3.15.

We should also have some facility for moving the SRCU workqueues to
housekeeping/timekeeping kthreads in the NO_HZ_FULL case.  Or does
this patch already have that effect?

							Thanx, Paul

> On 02/01/2014 03:53 AM, Zoran Markovic wrote:
> > From: Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@broadcom.com>
> > 
> > For better use of CPU idle time, allow the scheduler to select the CPU
> > on which the SRCU grace period work would be scheduled. This improves
> > idle residency time and conserves power.
> > 
> > This functionality is enabled when CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT is selected.
> > 
> > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@broadcom.com>
> > [zoran.markovic@linaro.org: Rebased to latest kernel version. Added commit
> > message. Fixed code alignment.]
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcu/srcu.c |    5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcu.c b/kernel/rcu/srcu.c
> > index 3318d82..a1ebe6d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcu.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcu.c
> > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct rcu_head *head,
> >  	rcu_batch_queue(&sp->batch_queue, head);
> >  	if (!sp->running) {
> >  		sp->running = true;
> > -		schedule_delayed_work(&sp->work, 0);
> > +		queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &sp->work, 0);
> >  	}
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sp->queue_lock, flags);
> >  }
> > @@ -674,7 +674,8 @@ static void srcu_reschedule(struct srcu_struct *sp)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (pending)
> > -		schedule_delayed_work(&sp->work, SRCU_INTERVAL);
> > +		queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> > +				   &sp->work, SRCU_INTERVAL);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-31 19:53 [RFC PATCH] rcu: move SRCU grace period work to power efficient workqueue Zoran Markovic
2014-01-31 20:10 ` Zoran Markovic
2014-02-10 10:08 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-02-10 18:47   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-02-12 18:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-12 19:02       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-12 19:23         ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 19:59           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-12 20:13             ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 23:04             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-13  0:33               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-13  1:30                 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-02-13 14:05                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-14 23:24           ` Kevin Hilman
2014-02-15  7:36             ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-16 16:41               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17  4:50                 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-19  7:00                   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-24 17:55                   ` Kevin Hilman
2014-02-24 18:25                     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-27 15:08             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-10  9:52             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-02-17  5:26       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-27 14:43         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-27 15:22           ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140210184729.GL4250@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaibal.dutta@broadcom.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zoran.markovic@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.