From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:16:02 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: Use pte manipulation functions for THP
In-Reply-To: <20140212100736.GA13441@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <1391696171-8922-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org>
 <20140212094338.GA11325@linaro.org>
 <20140212100736.GA13441@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Message-ID: <20140212101602.GD29702@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:07:37AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:43:39AM +0000, Steve Capper wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:16:08PM +0000, Steve Capper wrote:
> > > This series replaces the Transparent HugePage pmd manipulation
> > > functions with calls to the standard pte functions. This allows the THP
> > > code to take advantage of the new PTE_WRITE logic, and provides better
> > > parity with the HugeTLB code (which already uses the pte functions).
> > > 
> > > Testing was done on the Fast Model with LTP THP tests, and the 3.14-rc1
> > > kernel was used.
> > 
> > Does this series look reasonable?
> 
> I was waiting for the corresponding arch/arm/ changes.

The arch/arm/ code doesn't have the PTE_WRITE changes. It's a bit more
work here because of the classic MMU (but I hope Steve will get there ;).

-- 
Catalin