From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, jslaby@suse.cz,
ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: pl011: Move uart_register_driver call to device probe
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:14:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140214001436.GA16287@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140214000717.GG30257@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:07:17AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:26:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 06:42:49PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > We went through this before, and I stated the paths, and no one disagreed
> > > with that.
> > >
> > > It /is/ racy.
> >
> > Ok, I just went and looked at the uart driver register path, and I don't
> > see the race (note, if there is one, it's there today, regardless of
> > this patch).
>
> The race isn't the uart code, it's the driver model.
>
> Consider what happens when this happens:
>
> * Two pl011 devices get registered at the same time by two different
> threads.
How? What two different busses will see this same device? The amba bus
code should prevent that from happening, right? If not, there's bigger
problems in that bus code :)
That's where this problem should be fixed, if there is one, otherwise
this same issue would be there for any type of driver that calles into
the uart core, right?
> * Both devices have a lock taken on the _device_ itself before matching
> against the driver.
>
> * Both devices get matched to the same driver.
>
> * Both devices are passed into the driver's probe function.
>
> * Both check uart_reg.state, both call uart_register_driver() on that
> at the same time, which results in two allocations inside
> uart_register_driver(), one gets overwritten...
>
> So, the /only/ thing which stops this happening is that the devices
> are generally available before the driver is registered, and driver
> registration results in devices being probed serially. Moreover, both
> attempt to call tty_register_driver()... one succeeds, the other fails.
>
> However, what about the userspace bind/unbind methods. Yes, userspace
> can ask the driver core to unbind devices from a driver or bind - and
> again, there's no per-driver locking here. So, if you can trigger two
> concurrent binds from userspace, you hit the same race as above.
>
> So, if you want to accept these patches, go ahead, introduce races, but
> personally I'd recommend plugging these races.
The only way to solve this would be to do it in the bus, I don't see
anything here that makes it any "racier" than it currently is.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-20 9:02 [PATCH 0/2] serial: Move uart_register_driver call to device probe Tushar Behera
2014-01-20 9:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] serial: samsung: " Tushar Behera
2014-01-20 10:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 11:53 ` Tushar Behera
2014-01-20 12:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 21:43 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-20 23:14 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-20 23:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 23:35 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-20 23:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-20 23:47 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-21 0:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-21 9:03 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-21 9:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <50b66ac6-1150-4ad7-aeaf-3d0dce77334d@email.android.com>
2014-01-26 11:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 4:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 10:07 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-27 12:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 15:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-21 16:59 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-21 18:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-23 18:04 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-23 18:40 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-23 18:47 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-01-23 19:36 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-23 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-23 20:05 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-23 21:33 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-24 12:03 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-24 14:38 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-27 0:15 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-26 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-27 0:04 ` Alan Cox
2014-01-20 21:16 ` Greg KH
2014-01-20 21:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 23:11 ` Greg KH
2014-01-20 23:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 23:51 ` Greg KH
2014-01-21 0:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-21 0:26 ` Greg KH
2014-01-21 0:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-21 9:25 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-01-21 9:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-20 9:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] serial: pl011: " Tushar Behera
2014-01-20 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-13 18:12 ` Greg KH
2014-02-13 18:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-13 18:27 ` Greg KH
2014-02-13 18:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-13 23:26 ` Greg KH
2014-02-14 0:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-14 0:14 ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-02-14 0:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-17 15:35 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-17 15:54 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-17 23:50 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-18 10:09 ` Etched Pixels
2014-02-19 13:57 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19 14:47 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-19 15:53 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19 0:47 ` One Thousand Gnomes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140214001436.GA16287@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tushar.behera@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.