From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: Another preempt folding issue? (maybe bisect)
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:21:32 +0100
Message-ID: <20140214152132.GD26356@pd.tnic>
References: <20140212103713.GE3545@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20140212104017.GA5121@pd.tnic>
 <52FB5669.7090506@canonical.com>
 <20140212115412.GW27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <52FCFA23.4060701@canonical.com>
 <20140213173852.GH6835@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <52FD090C.7010408@canonical.com>
 <20140213182605.GC14089@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20140214133428.GB26356@pd.tnic>
 <52FE2709.3050505@canonical.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	MASAO TAKAHASHI <masao-takahashi@kanno.co.jp>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52FE2709.3050505@canonical.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Oh, and just in case this is relatively easy to reproduce and in case we
don't have any other idea, bisection might be another option. I'm not
saying you should do it right away - I'm just putting it on the table...

:-)

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--