From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Optimize rcu_is_nocb_cpu() for RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:33:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140217233331.GR4250@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140217215053.GE7941@thin>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 01:50:53PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 01:40:25PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > If CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y, then rcu_is_nocb_cpu() will always
> > return true, however, the current version nevertheless checks
> > rcu_nocb_mask. This commit therefore creates a static inline
> > implementation of rcu_is_nocb_cpu() that unconditionally returns
> > true when CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> One suggestion below. With or without that change:
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
I like the change -- applied both it and your Reviewed-by.
Thanx, Paul
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 ++++
> > kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > index 72bf3a01a4ee..92365b1fede4 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -1016,7 +1016,11 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void)
> > __kfree_rcu(&((ptr)->rcu_head), offsetof(typeof(*(ptr)), rcu_head))
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL
> > +static inline bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu) { return true; }
> > +#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
> > bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu);
> > +#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
> > #else
> > static inline bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
> > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
>
> This seem clearer if written without the nesting:
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL)
> static inline bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu) { return true; }
> #elif defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU)
> bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu);
> #else
> static inline bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
> #endif
>
> That clearly distinguishes the three cases: all, some, none.
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > index 6e2ef4b2b920..39a50b918bff 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > @@ -2101,6 +2101,7 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> > init_waitqueue_head(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[1]);
> > }
> >
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL
> > /* Is the specified CPU a no-CPUs CPU? */
> > bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
> > {
> > @@ -2108,6 +2109,7 @@ bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
> > return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
> > return false;
> > }
> > +#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
> >
> > /*
> > * Enqueue the specified string of rcu_head structures onto the specified
> > --
> > 1.8.1.5
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-17 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 21:40 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] Response-time changes for 3.15 Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:40 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Optimize rcu_is_nocb_cpu() for RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:40 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Optimize rcu_needs_cpu() " Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:53 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-17 21:40 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Optimize RCU_FAST_NO_HZ " Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:54 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-17 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Optimize rcu_is_nocb_cpu() " Josh Triplett
2014-02-17 23:33 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-18 22:02 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/3] RT latency optimizations Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-18 22:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Optimize rcu_is_nocb_cpu() for RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140217233331.GR4250@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.