From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2 v2] pci: change default value of rom_bar to 2
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:13:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140220081359.GB28812@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392842205.15608.548.camel@ul30vt.home>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:36:45PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 15:20 -0500, Bandan Das wrote:
> > The following patch depends on the value of rom_bar to
> > determine rom blacklist behavior. Existing code shouldn't
> > be affected by changing the default value of rom_bar since
> > all relevant decisions only rely on whether rom_bar is zero
> > or non-zero.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/pci/pci.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> > index 4e0701d..12c3e27 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -53,7 +53,12 @@ static void pci_bus_finalize(Object *obj);
> > static Property pci_props[] = {
> > DEFINE_PROP_PCI_DEVFN("addr", PCIDevice, devfn, -1),
> > DEFINE_PROP_STRING("romfile", PCIDevice, romfile),
> > - DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("rombar", PCIDevice, rom_bar, 1),
> > + /*
> > + * 0 = disable
> > + * 1 = user requested on, force loading even if rom blacklisted
> > + * 2 = enabled but disables loading of blacklisted roms (default)
> > + */
> > + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("rombar", PCIDevice, rom_bar, 2),
> > DEFINE_PROP_BIT("multifunction", PCIDevice, cap_present,
> > QEMU_PCI_CAP_MULTIFUNCTION_BITNR, false),
> > DEFINE_PROP_BIT("command_serr_enable", PCIDevice, cap_present,
>
> A slightly more satisfying option might be to define rom_bar as int32_t
> with default of -1. I don't know if that would break libvirt though.
> I'll let MST weigh in. Thanks,
>
> Alex
I don't see rombar in json schema at all.
I think it was designed as an internal flag
for compatibility with legacy machine types.
As such it's likely not a good interface
for users.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-20 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 20:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v2] vfio: blacklist loading of unstable roms Bandan Das
2014-02-19 20:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2 v2] pci: change default value of rom_bar to 2 Bandan Das
2014-02-19 20:36 ` Alex Williamson
2014-02-19 20:43 ` Bandan Das
2014-02-20 8:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-02-20 8:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-20 17:22 ` Bandan Das
2014-02-22 23:28 ` Alex Williamson
2014-02-23 6:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-23 14:18 ` Alex Williamson
2014-02-24 0:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-24 1:32 ` Bandan Das
2014-02-24 2:56 ` Alex Williamson
2014-02-19 20:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2 v2] vfio: blacklist loading of unstable roms Bandan Das
2014-02-19 20:58 ` Alex Williamson
2014-02-20 17:27 ` Bandan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140220081359.GB28812@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.