From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com (mail-ee0-f45.google.com [74.125.83.45]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF54A6B6BC for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 20:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id e53so729809eek.18 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:46:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PrKUMjSodmplur1Zbzb1CgZbVLPzeZcEdjhfnG+v9r8=; b=cISc2B1JTKWvfrpepR4Gb2luCcLcTZWZJAaXAQgbP/8SvmxTNLZvF7+etuHyBa7yJ5 NCuZc3SQ0LbC/3g9CnWPsmpiSHPnVIcFZq8n9vb2Kon5kEHN3U3r21+Z4dnp1hxL04Xk 4R2aVVFtiM/ec9XbL+kihiEpRYpsnv+gHMGQKTo8KhMHFiEfQ+UMvb2dK7EWix/SX8/M ZvbW+Tb9yR5LBNG6REdlp8S/FvSvYY+zQfDIJkIQU5ZjIYMxya6YAnMqZ6O6rsTVzlnQ LixQI7+OjKgGAcx7VwZTCcGLGHC1tHhCW0tngwyyt0TMmI+ZnjQCc665dC0Q4tGea765 1ZuQ== X-Received: by 10.15.55.193 with SMTP id v41mr16183768eew.80.1393101994929; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:46:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-89-176-104-3.net.upcbroadband.cz. [89.176.104.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o43sm42908018eef.12.2014.02.22.12.46.33 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:46:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:47:10 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Phil Blundell Message-ID: <20140222204710.GQ3854@jama> References: <20140221151607.GG3854@jama> <1392996116.1560.14.camel@ted> <8730C02B-B94E-4873-88D1-E5BA9063B585@dominion.thruhere.net> <1393058961.5181.4.camel@ted> <1393092730.2640.25.camel@e130.pbcl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1393092730.2640.25.camel@e130.pbcl.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: Koen Kooi , openembedded-core Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH 0/2] Systemd 209 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 20:46:35 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 50452 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oDto3OTLsk6uOlQH" Content-Disposition: inline --oDto3OTLsk6uOlQH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 06:12:10PM +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 01:31 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > builds might work but they won=E2=80=99t run and yes so far IFUNC suppo= rt is needed so it won=E2=80=99t work on non-x86 > > architectures. One common runtime problem I am seeing is logind not bei= ng able to talk to dbus > > across all architectures. I have pushed my latest rework to pull branch >=20 > What is the problem with ifunc on non-x86? As far as I know the > compiler, assembler, linker and ld.so for all reasonable architectures > support that nowadays (though prelink support is a bit patchy). GCC > didn't have ifuncs enabled for some architectures until quite recently > but if that was the problem then you'd see compile-time failures. So, > if it compiles then I can't think of any reason why it oughtn't to run. > Is this a uclibc thing? I'm seeing lots of compile errors like this: | arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-libtool: link: arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ranlib .libs/lib= systemd-units.a | libsystemd-id128.c:6:6: error: ifunc is not supported in this configurati= on | void sd_id128_to_string(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolve_sd_id128_to_= string"))); | ^ --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --oDto3OTLsk6uOlQH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlMJDM4ACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBw/IACghHLbkbOv38PItpGlrDVgqB4w togAoKc+4+3fqXRnrhWJz0tm2FJcmoaj =4RI7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oDto3OTLsk6uOlQH--