From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHyOi-0002ow-Fp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:28:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHyOh-0007HE-FB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:28:52 -0500 Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([2a01:238:20a:202:5300::6]:46250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHyOh-0007Fk-5L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:28:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:28:43 +0100 From: Olaf Hering Message-ID: <20140224162843.GA18456@aepfle.de> References: <1391702379-20042-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <20140220182057.GB19843@aepfle.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] xen_disk: add discard support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com On Sun, Feb 23, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Given that 4.2 is the first Xen release to have BLKIF_OP_DISCARD, maybe > we could just #define BLKIF_OP_DISCARD 5 in that case? > Do we actually need to #ifndef BLKIF_OP_DISCARD? I will do just the #define and resend with that change. Olaf