From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] idle: Move idle conditions in cpuidle_idle main function
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:22:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140224172207.GC9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530B7B4E.50306@linaro.org>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Well there is the polling idle state for the x86 and ppc cpuidle drivers.
> Except that, I think we have something more or less clean.
Yeah, they have to set it back to polling again :/
Ideally we'd sweep the entire tree and switch the default polling state
to polling and add a current_clr_polling_and_test() to all WFI/HLT like
ones that need the interrupt.
But lots of work that.
> >- if (need_resched()) {
>
> Ok. The need_resched is now replaced by 'current_clr_polling_and_test', with
> a call to '__current_set_polling()' to set the flag back, right ?
Yah.
> For my personal information, what is the subtlety with:
>
> if (tif_need_resched())
> set_preempt_need_resched();
>
> ?
Urgh, looks like something went wrong with: cf37b6b48428d
That commit doesn't actually remove kernel/cpu/idle.c nor is the new
code an exact replica of the old one.
Ingo, any chance we can get that fixed?
Daniel; does the below change/comment clarify?
---
Subject: sched/idle: Fixup merge fail of idle.c move
Commit cf37b6b48428d ("sched/idle: Move cpu/idle.c to sched/idle.c")
said to simply move a file; somehow it got mangled and created an old
version of the file and forgot to remove the old file.
Fix this fail; add the lost change and remove the now identical old
file.
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Fixes: cf37b6b48428d ("sched/idle: Move cpu/idle.c to sched/idle.c")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/cpu/idle.c | 147 ----------------------------------------------------
kernel/sched/idle.c | 17 +++---
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu/idle.c b/kernel/cpu/idle.c
deleted file mode 100644
index b7976a127178..000000000000
--- a/kernel/cpu/idle.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,147 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Generic entry point for the idle threads
- */
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/cpu.h>
-#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
-#include <linux/tick.h>
-#include <linux/mm.h>
-#include <linux/stackprotector.h>
-
-#include <asm/tlb.h>
-
-#include <trace/events/power.h>
-
-static int __read_mostly cpu_idle_force_poll;
-
-void cpu_idle_poll_ctrl(bool enable)
-{
- if (enable) {
- cpu_idle_force_poll++;
- } else {
- cpu_idle_force_poll--;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_idle_force_poll < 0);
- }
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IDLE_POLL_SETUP
-static int __init cpu_idle_poll_setup(char *__unused)
-{
- cpu_idle_force_poll = 1;
- return 1;
-}
-__setup("nohlt", cpu_idle_poll_setup);
-
-static int __init cpu_idle_nopoll_setup(char *__unused)
-{
- cpu_idle_force_poll = 0;
- return 1;
-}
-__setup("hlt", cpu_idle_nopoll_setup);
-#endif
-
-static inline int cpu_idle_poll(void)
-{
- rcu_idle_enter();
- trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(0, smp_processor_id());
- local_irq_enable();
- while (!tif_need_resched())
- cpu_relax();
- trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id());
- rcu_idle_exit();
- return 1;
-}
-
-/* Weak implementations for optional arch specific functions */
-void __weak arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void) { }
-void __weak arch_cpu_idle_enter(void) { }
-void __weak arch_cpu_idle_exit(void) { }
-void __weak arch_cpu_idle_dead(void) { }
-void __weak arch_cpu_idle(void)
-{
- cpu_idle_force_poll = 1;
- local_irq_enable();
-}
-
-/*
- * Generic idle loop implementation
- */
-static void cpu_idle_loop(void)
-{
- while (1) {
- tick_nohz_idle_enter();
-
- while (!need_resched()) {
- check_pgt_cache();
- rmb();
-
- if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
- arch_cpu_idle_dead();
-
- local_irq_disable();
- arch_cpu_idle_enter();
-
- /*
- * In poll mode we reenable interrupts and spin.
- *
- * Also if we detected in the wakeup from idle
- * path that the tick broadcast device expired
- * for us, we don't want to go deep idle as we
- * know that the IPI is going to arrive right
- * away
- */
- if (cpu_idle_force_poll || tick_check_broadcast_expired()) {
- cpu_idle_poll();
- } else {
- if (!current_clr_polling_and_test()) {
- stop_critical_timings();
- rcu_idle_enter();
- if (cpuidle_idle_call())
- arch_cpu_idle();
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled()))
- local_irq_enable();
- rcu_idle_exit();
- start_critical_timings();
- } else {
- local_irq_enable();
- }
- __current_set_polling();
- }
- arch_cpu_idle_exit();
- }
-
- /*
- * Since we fell out of the loop above, we know
- * TIF_NEED_RESCHED must be set, propagate it into
- * PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED.
- *
- * This is required because for polling idle loops we will
- * not have had an IPI to fold the state for us.
- */
- preempt_set_need_resched();
- tick_nohz_idle_exit();
- schedule_preempt_disabled();
- }
-}
-
-void cpu_startup_entry(enum cpuhp_state state)
-{
- /*
- * This #ifdef needs to die, but it's too late in the cycle to
- * make this generic (arm and sh have never invoked the canary
- * init for the non boot cpus!). Will be fixed in 3.11
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
- /*
- * If we're the non-boot CPU, nothing set the stack canary up
- * for us. The boot CPU already has it initialized but no harm
- * in doing it again. This is a good place for updating it, as
- * we wont ever return from this function (so the invalid
- * canaries already on the stack wont ever trigger).
- */
- boot_init_stack_canary();
-#endif
- __current_set_polling();
- arch_cpu_idle_prepare();
- cpu_idle_loop();
-}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
index 14ca43430aee..b7976a127178 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -108,14 +108,17 @@ static void cpu_idle_loop(void)
__current_set_polling();
}
arch_cpu_idle_exit();
- /*
- * We need to test and propagate the TIF_NEED_RESCHED
- * bit here because we might not have send the
- * reschedule IPI to idle tasks.
- */
- if (tif_need_resched())
- set_preempt_need_resched();
}
+
+ /*
+ * Since we fell out of the loop above, we know
+ * TIF_NEED_RESCHED must be set, propagate it into
+ * PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED.
+ *
+ * This is required because for polling idle loops we will
+ * not have had an IPI to fold the state for us.
+ */
+ preempt_set_need_resched();
tick_nohz_idle_exit();
schedule_preempt_disabled();
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-24 13:55 [PATCH V2 1/5] idle/cpuidle: Split cpuidle_idle_call main function into smaller functions Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 13:55 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] cpuidle/idle: Move the cpuidle_idle_call function to idle.c Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 13:55 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] idle: Reorganize the idle loop Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 13:55 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] idle: Move idle conditions in cpuidle_idle main function Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-24 15:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-24 17:03 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-02-24 17:54 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-24 17:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-24 19:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-27 13:32 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/idle: Remove stale old file tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-24 13:55 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] idle: Add more comments to the code Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 15:00 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] idle/cpuidle: Split cpuidle_idle_call main function into smaller functions Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-24 15:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 15:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-25 3:35 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-25 3:47 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-25 6:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140224172207.GC9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.