From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups v2
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:37:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140224203743.GF14009@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530B7F75.1050600@fb.com>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:20:53AM -0800, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2014-02-24 07:39, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This version includes:
> >
> >* Rename __smp_call_function_single to smp_call_function_single() as
> > suggested by Christoph.
> >
> >* Acks and reviewed-by added.
> >
> >* Rebase against -rc4
> >
> >Thanks.
>
> I'd be happy to take this in, as it's mostly centered around the blk
> cleanups.
I initially planned to push this tree to Ingo because I have some nohz patches
that will depend on this set.
But there is indeed quite some block changes there. So I should let these go
through your tree to avoid bad conflicts. If you never rebase your tree I can
work on top if it.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-24 15:39 [PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: Stop abusing csd.list for fifo_time Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: Remove useless IPI struct initialization Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: Stop abusing rq->csd.list in blk-softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: Iterate functions through llist_for_each_entry_safe() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: Remove unused list_head from csd Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: Teach __smp_call_function_single() to check for offline cpus Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Consolidate the various smp_call_function_single() declensions Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 08/11] smp: Move __smp_call_function_single() below its safe version Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:40 ` [PATCH 09/11] watchdog: Simplify a little the IPI call Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:40 ` [PATCH 11/11] smp: Rename __smp_call_function_single() to smp_call_function_single_async() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 17:20 ` [PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups v2 Jens Axboe
2014-02-24 20:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-02-24 22:45 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140224203743.GF14009@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.