From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:11:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH resend] pwm: Remove obsolete HAVE_PWM Kconfig symbol In-Reply-To: <20140210102017.GA20143@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <1390550056-5924-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20140210102017.GA20143@ulmo.nvidia.com> Message-ID: <201402252011.01902.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 10 February 2014, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:54:16AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Thierry as PWM maintainer has agreed to take this patch. Would be nice > > to get some Acks from affected architectures. Russell, Ralf? > > No replies for over two weeks and this looks simple enough, so I just > went ahead and applied it. Thanks, Am I looking in the wrong place, or have you not pushed this for linux-next yet? I still see all the HAVE_PWM symbols in today's -next. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753496AbaBYTLU (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:11:20 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:64939 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752598AbaBYTLT (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:11:19 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] pwm: Remove obsolete HAVE_PWM Kconfig symbol Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:11:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Thierry Reding , Sascha Hauer , Eric Miao , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haojian Zhuang , Ralf Baechle , Russell King , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.orig References: <1390550056-5924-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20140210102017.GA20143@ulmo.nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <20140210102017.GA20143@ulmo.nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201402252011.01902.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:d60W9E5Xj+lgBtBntJFO4kwTB1OjColK4WLm0P6N6Ct WPIhJNzCcm8K1XbiHtSTuR+szr5VqBkbpTnFDfLrplOdTXxRdp tdJPCcjC1feZ40/BXoBGt4LC/SrggZRzQe7LUNIjRLHEAH+oqC E5kxTgxlrkZGbI03K6K0MoeWBNEpnaH8DeG7xWH5Xtx9CwaFP+ GRR8pCHTyKoOIdILOYtBkNypHIS1cApCBd1nKGIh7HKd5m2YnS 5xHU1UhBdJZ38PY3Z+tQCr/TWTlrQJc/xeGQgV5ne2zWHHtV+U cP3Xa5ra6QaENjf65WOg/eNVi/YY9YDPq7kqr1gs/NwxHwMtwr Gec84XIf5mZCKFJkjJ8Y= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 10 February 2014, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:54:16AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Thierry as PWM maintainer has agreed to take this patch. Would be nice > > to get some Acks from affected architectures. Russell, Ralf? > > No replies for over two weeks and this looks simple enough, so I just > went ahead and applied it. Thanks, Am I looking in the wrong place, or have you not pushed this for linux-next yet? I still see all the HAVE_PWM symbols in today's -next. Arnd