From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: davinci: tnetv107x removal Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:46:28 +0100 Message-ID: <201402261446.29257.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1393418614-3968549-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1393418614-3968549-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alexandre Courbot Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sekhar Nori , Kevin Hilman , davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, Dmitry Torokhov , Lee Jones , Linus Walleij , Mark Brown , Samuel Ortiz , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The five patches are completely independent of one another, > and applying them out of order is fine since we just want > to remove the code. However, I'm looking for an Ack from > Cyril Chemparathy and Sekhar Nori first, to be sure we > won't need this code in the future. Kevin Hilman has > already mentioned that he sees no reason to keep this > code. Hmm, apparently Cyril is no longer at TI. If anyone has his current email address and thinks he might have an opinion, could you forward the original email? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:46:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: davinci: tnetv107x removal In-Reply-To: <1393418614-3968549-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> References: <1393418614-3968549-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <201402261446.29257.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The five patches are completely independent of one another, > and applying them out of order is fine since we just want > to remove the code. However, I'm looking for an Ack from > Cyril Chemparathy and Sekhar Nori first, to be sure we > won't need this code in the future. Kevin Hilman has > already mentioned that he sees no reason to keep this > code. Hmm, apparently Cyril is no longer at TI. If anyone has his current email address and thinks he might have an opinion, could you forward the original email? Arnd