From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3858DE0091C for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:28:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s1QISG8j011142; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:28:16 -0600 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s1QISG9r029061; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:28:16 -0600 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:28:16 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s1QISGhw002202; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:28:16 -0600 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:28:15 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Diego Sueiro Message-ID: <20140226182815.GO22125@edge> References: <20140211162752.GL3131@edge> <20140211164725.GN3131@edge> <20140212162334.GE4346@edge> <20140226164733.GK22125@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti mailing list Subject: Re: How to compile omap3-sgx-modules_4.09.00.01 X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:28:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 02:56:13PM -0300, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Denys, > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > Yes, meta-arago is compatible with dora. > > > Looking at meta-arago git log dora, the support was introduced 8 days ago. > :-) Well, that is when master branch switched to dora. There were patches and WIP available earlier. All that was discussed and covered on meta-arago mailing list at the time... > > But this is not the right mailing > > list to discuss it... > > > Sorry about that.