From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] merge: Add hints to tell users about "git merge --abort"
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:38:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140226203836.GM7855@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393437985-31401-3-git-send-email-andrew.kw.w@gmail.com>
Andrew Wong wrote:
> --- a/builtin/merge.c
> +++ b/builtin/merge.c
> @@ -909,7 +909,8 @@ static int suggest_conflicts(int renormalizing)
> fclose(fp);
> rerere(allow_rerere_auto);
> printf(_("Automatic merge failed; "
> - "fix conflicts and then commit the result.\n"));
> + "fix conflicts and then commit the result.\n"
> + "To abort the merge, use \"git merge --abort\".\n"));
Seems reasonable, but I worry about the command growing too noisy.
Could this be guarded by an advice.<something> setting? (See advice.*
in git-config(1) for what I mean.)
[...]
> --- a/wt-status.c
> +++ b/wt-status.c
> @@ -907,6 +907,9 @@ static void show_merge_in_progress(struct wt_status *s,
> status_printf_ln(s, color,
> _(" (use \"git commit\" to conclude merge)"));
> }
> + if (s->hints)
> + status_printf_ln(s, color,
> + _(" (use \"git merge --abort\" to abort the merge)\n"));
Perhaps:
...
_(" (or use \"git merge --abort\" to abort the merge)"));
to clarify that this is an alternative to the advice immediately above.
`status_printf_ln` already prints a newline, so the translated message
shouldn't include an extra one.
Thanks,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 18:06 [RFC 0/3] Make git more user-friendly during a merge conflict Andrew Wong
2014-02-26 18:06 ` [RFC 1/3] wt-status: Make conflict hint message more consistent with other hints Andrew Wong
2014-02-26 20:34 ` Jonathan Nieder
2014-02-26 20:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-26 23:07 ` Andrew Wong
2014-02-26 18:06 ` [RFC 2/3] merge: Add hints to tell users about "git merge --abort" Andrew Wong
2014-02-26 20:38 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2014-02-26 23:16 ` Andrew Wong
2014-03-05 15:30 ` Andrew Wong
2014-03-05 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-05 20:51 ` Andrew Wong
2014-03-05 21:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-05 18:35 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-26 18:06 ` [RFC 3/3] reset: Change the default behavior to use "--merge" during a merge Andrew Wong
2014-02-26 18:21 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-26 20:15 ` Andrew Wong
2014-02-26 20:48 ` Jonathan Nieder
2014-02-26 23:37 ` Andrew Wong
2014-02-26 20:57 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-02-27 0:00 ` Andrew Wong
2014-02-26 20:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-11 4:39 ` Andrew Wong
2014-02-26 20:26 ` [RFC 0/3] Make git more user-friendly during a merge conflict Jonathan Nieder
2014-02-28 9:01 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 9:14 ` Charles Bailey
2014-02-28 10:11 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-28 14:13 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 14:21 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-28 17:26 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 17:33 ` David Kastrup
2014-03-01 10:32 ` Stephen Leake
2014-03-01 11:38 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-03-01 16:50 ` Stephen Leake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140226203836.GM7855@google.com \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.kw.w@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.