From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:49:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:44:53 +0100 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20140227214453.GA4618@fancy-poultry.org> References: <530F4E30.6000204@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <530F4E30.6000204@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] [ANNOUNCE] cryptsetup 1.6.4 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 27.02.2014, Milan Broz wrote: > * Add internal "whirlpool_gcryptbug hash" for accessing flawed > Whirlpool hash in gcrypt (requires gcrypt 1.6.1 or above). > > The gcrypt version of Whirlpool hash algorithm was flawed in some > situations. Just to be shure: if I create an encrypted partition using the whirlpool hash algorithm with recent cryptsetup / libgcrypt, does it have its full strength?