From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: >16TB Btrfs volumes are mountable on 32 bit kernels
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:38:07 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140228043807.GC13647@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530FA8FA.9020700@fb.com>
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:07:06PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/27/2014 04:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > User reports successfully formatting and using an ~18TB Btrfs
> > volume on hardware raid5 using i686 kernel for over a year, and
> > then suddenly the file system starts behaving weirdly:
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs%40vger.kernel.org/msg31856.html&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=cKCbChRKsMpTX8ybrSkonQ%3D%3D%0A&m=6eUt5RgBggFh930oFrH19iR4z%2BFVzT%2F0%2F4dYPt3g48U%3D%0A&s=5ac126734d7fa1d3238ab09a2ddc021a8dcc8fff7b022560a4d068be2de37c00
> >
> >
> >
> > I think this is due to the kernel page cache address space being
> > 16TB limited on 32-bit kernels, as mentioned by Dave Chinner in
> > this thread:
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2014-February/034588.html&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=cKCbChRKsMpTX8ybrSkonQ%3D%3D%0A&m=6eUt5RgBggFh930oFrH19iR4z%2BFVzT%2F0%2F4dYPt3g48U%3D%0A&s=3e45f9288e6a77bc1a24dded368802c2ab46b812bf59953f74d4ee1d4141f7d2
> >
> > So it sounds like it shouldn't be possible to mount a Btrfs volume
> > larger than 16TB on 32-bit kernels. This is consistent with ext4
> > and XFS which refuse to mount large file systems.
> >
> >
>
> Well that's not good, I'll fix this up. Thanks,
Well, don't go assuming there's a problem just because I made an
off-hand comment. i.e my comment was simply "maybe it hasn't been
tested", and not an assertion that there is a bug or a problem....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-28 4:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 21:05 BUG: >16TB Btrfs volumes are mountable on 32 bit kernels Chris Murphy
2014-02-27 21:07 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-27 21:13 ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-28 4:38 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-02-28 13:05 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140228043807.GC13647@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.