From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md / procfs: avoid Oops if md-mod removed while /proc/mdstat is being polled.
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:07:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140228100757.7dbd3dae@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140227135125.92a56ff656b3ca8d0b5d9029@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2200 bytes --]
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:51:25 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:34:43 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:58:07 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:24:45 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If poll or select is waiting on /proc/mdstat when md-mod is unloaded
> > > > an oops will ensure when the poll/select completes.
> > > >
> > > > This is because the wait_queue_head which is registered with poll_wait()
> > > > is local to the module and no longer exists when the poll completes and
> > > > detaches that wait_queue_head (in poll_free_wait -> remove_wait_queue).
> > > >
> > > > To fix this we need the wait_queue_head to have (at least) the same life
> > > > time as the proc_dir_entry. So this patch places it in that structure.
> > > >
> > > > We:
> > > > - add pde_poll_wait to struct proc_dir_entry
> > > > - call poll_wait() passing this when poll() is called on the proc file
> > > > - export a function proc_wake_up which will call wake_up() on pde_poll_wait
> > > >
> > > > and make use of all that in md.c
> > >
> > > This sounds wrong. If a userspace process is waiting on
> > > md_event_waiters then the md module is "busy" and the rmmod attempt
> > > should fail?
> >
> > Al Viro says "no" quite firmly.
> >
> > I think the core argument is that
> >
> > rmmod md-mod < /proc/mdstat
> >
> > would deadlock.
>
> Well, only if the rmmod hangs around waiting for the module to go idle.
> I'm thinking rmmod should fail. EBUSY.
>
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133024267507384
>
> Why don't a billion blocking-procfs-read sites have this problem?
>
This issue of a file in /proc (actually /proc/fs/nfsd which is a separate
filesystem) blocking came up on the NFS list recently.
Experiments suggested that no other files in /proc block reads
(though /proc/vmcore takes somewhat longer to 'cat' than most).
So the offending file was changed to never block.
i.e. I think your 'billion' estimate is a little high, by one billion.
:-)
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 6:24 [PATCH] md / procfs: avoid Oops if md-mod removed while /proc/mdstat is being polled NeilBrown
2014-02-27 20:58 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-27 21:34 ` NeilBrown
2014-02-27 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-27 23:07 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-02-27 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-03 3:53 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140228100757.7dbd3dae@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majianpeng@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.