All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Borislav Petkov <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>,
	Matt Fleming
	<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] x86/efi: Build our own EFI services pointer table
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:12:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140228141206.GA17881@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530F9B71.1030405-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 27 Feb, at 12:09:21PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> That being said, is there a reason we can't simply write this as:
> 
> 	efi_system_table_##bits##_t table;
> 
> 	/* ... */
> 
> 	func = (typeof(func))(unsigned long)table->con_out;
> 	c->text_output = *func;

Oh, yeah that's much better. I was being overly cautious with trying to
not dereference the pointers in the regular efi_system_table_t, and what
you've written is much more compact both in terms of C and generated
object code. Things end up looking like this,

---

#define BOOT_SERVICES(bits)						\
static void setup_boot_services##bits(struct efi_config *c)		\
{									\
	efi_system_table_##bits##_t *table;				\
	efi_boot_services_##bits##_t *bt;				\
									\
	table = (typeof(table))sys_table;				\
									\
	c->text_output = table->con_out;				\
									\
	bt = (typeof(bt))(unsigned long)(table->boottime);		\
									\
	c->allocate_pool = bt->allocate_pool;				\
	c->allocate_pages = bt->allocate_pages;				\
	c->get_memory_map = bt->get_memory_map;				\
	c->free_pool = bt->free_pool;					\
	c->free_pages = bt->free_pages;					\
	c->locate_handle = bt->locate_handle;				\
	c->handle_protocol = bt->handle_protocol;			\
	c->exit_boot_services = bt->exit_boot_services;			\
}
BOOT_SERVICES(32);
BOOT_SERVICES(64);

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-28 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-27 19:50 [PATCH 00/13] EFI mixed mode Matt Fleming
     [not found] ` <1393530660-12692-1-git-send-email-matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/boot: Cleanup header.S by removing some #ifdefs Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 02/13] x86, tools: Consolidate #ifdef code Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/mm/pageattr: Always dump the right page table in an oops Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/efi: Delete dead code when checking for non-native Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 05/13] efi: Add separate 32-bit/64-bit definitions Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 06/13] x86/efi: Build our own EFI services pointer table Matt Fleming
     [not found]     ` <1393530660-12692-7-git-send-email-matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-27 20:09       ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]         ` <530F9B71.1030405-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-28 14:12           ` Matt Fleming [this message]
     [not found]             ` <20140228141206.GA17881-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-28 15:14               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/efi: Add early thunk code to go from 64-bit to 32-bit Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 08/13] x86/efi: Split the boot stub into 32/64 code paths Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/efi: Firmware agnostic handover entry points Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/efi: Add mixed runtime services support Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/efi: Wire up CONFIG_EFI_MIXED Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:50   ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/boot: Don't overwrite cr4 when enabling PAE Matt Fleming
2014-02-27 19:51   ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/efi: Re-disable interrupts after calling firmware services Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140228141206.GA17881@console-pimps.org \
    --to=matt-hnk1s37rvnbexh+ff434mdi2o/jbrioy@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.