All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivercore: deferral race condition fix
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:33:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140301003320.GA31852@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393398414-10822-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 09:06:54AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> When the kernel is built with CONFIG_PREEMPT it is possible to reach a state
> when all modules are loaded but some driver still stuck in the deferred list
> and there is a need for external event to kick the deferred queue to probe
> these drivers.
> 
> The issue has been observed on embedded systems with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled,
> audio support built as modules and using nfsroot for root filesystem.
> 
> The following fragment of a log shows such sequence when all audio modules
> were loaded but the sound card is not present since the machine driver has
> failed to probe due to missing dependency during it's probe.
> The board is am335x-evmsk (McASP<->tlv320aic3106 codec) with davinci-evm
> machine driver:
> 
> ...
> [   12.615118] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: davinci_mcasp_probe: ENTER
> [   12.719969] davinci_evm sound.3: davinci_evm_probe: ENTER
> [   12.725753] davinci_evm sound.3: davinci_evm_probe: snd_soc_register_card
> [   12.753846] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: davinci_mcasp_probe: snd_soc_register_component
> [   12.922051] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: davinci_mcasp_probe: snd_soc_register_component DONE
> [   12.950839] davinci_evm sound.3: ASoC: platform (null) not registered
> [   12.957898] davinci_evm sound.3: davinci_evm_probe: snd_soc_register_card DONE (-517)
> [   13.099026] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: Kicking the deferred list
> [   13.177838] davinci-mcasp 4803c000.mcasp: really_probe: probe_count = 2
> [   13.194130] davinci_evm sound.3: snd_soc_register_card failed (-517)
> [   13.346755] davinci_mcasp_driver_init: LEAVE
> [   13.377446] platform sound.3: Driver davinci_evm requests probe deferral
> [   13.592527] platform sound.3: really_probe: probe_count = 0
> 
> In the log the machine driver enters it's probe at 12.719969 (this point it
> has been removed from the deferred lists). McASP driver already executing
> it's probing (12.615118) and finishes first as well.
> The machine driver tries to construct the sound card (12.950839) but did
> not found one of the components so it fails. After this McASP driver
> registers all the ASoC components and the deferred work is prepared at
> 13.099026 (note that this time the machine driver is not in the lists so it
> is not going to be handled when the work is executing).
> Lastly the machine driver exit from it's probe and the core places it to the
> deferred list but there will be no other driver going to load and the
> deferred queue is not going to be kicked again - till we have external event
> like connecting USB stick, etc.
> 
> The proposed solution is to try the deferred queue once more when the last
> driver is asking for deferring and we had drivers loaded while this last
> driver was probing.

"once more"?  What happens if we get a new driver in when that one is
being probed?

It sounds like there's a race condition here somewhere, or improper
locking going on, just "let's try it again" doesn't sound like the
correct fix to me, does it to you?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-01  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-26  7:06 [PATCH] drivercore: deferral race condition fix Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-01  0:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2014-03-03  8:26   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-04  4:56     ` Mark Brown
2014-04-02  6:38       ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-04-02 23:18         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-04-03  9:07           ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140301003320.GA31852@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.