From: Lauri Kasanen <cand@gmx.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: TTM must be init with cpu-visible VRAM, v2
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 11:15:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140301111500.cd313296.cand@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9tw88uH6SY1=PzG23=F222mTTVNbxXJc+TKjWFQSkdze4w@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 06:47:41 +1000
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> wrote:
> > Am 28.02.2014 19:50, schrieb Lauri Kasanen:
> >
> >> Without this, a bo may get created in the cpu-inaccessible vram.
> >> Before the CP engines get setup, all copies are done via cpu memcpy.
> >>
> >> This means that the cpu tries to read from inaccessible memory, fails,
> >> and the radeon module proceeds to disable acceleration.
> >>
> >> Doing this has no downsides, as the real VRAM size gets set as soon as the
> >> CP engines get init.
> >>
> >> This is a candidate for 3.14 fixes.
> >>
> >> v2: Add comment on why the function is used
>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>
>> And I suggest to add "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" as well.
>
> Won't this create objects that are stuck in the middle of VRAM with
> the new top down approach?
>
> then when we go to use all the VRAM they'll be pinned in the middle?
Yes, the initial pins would act like that with the top-down code. But
the top-down logic is 3.15 material and still WIP.
Depending on their constraints, I think I'll either add a new flag, or
turn them into FIXED allocations - do they need to be at exact position
foo or only at the beginning. (Christian?)
So sending this fix to stable is safe, as they all use bottom-up.
- Lauri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-01 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-28 18:50 [PATCH] drm/radeon: TTM must be init with cpu-visible VRAM, v2 Lauri Kasanen
2014-02-28 19:20 ` Alex Deucher
2014-02-28 19:56 ` Christian König
2014-02-28 20:47 ` Dave Airlie
2014-03-01 9:15 ` Lauri Kasanen [this message]
2014-03-01 10:29 ` Christian König
2014-03-02 17:05 ` Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140301111500.cd313296.cand@gmx.com \
--to=cand@gmx.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.