From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de
 [212.227.126.187])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Sat,  1 Mar 2014 17:50:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 17:50:25 +0100
From: Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Message-ID: <20140301165025.GA1719@fancy-poultry.org>
References: <530F4E30.6000204@gmail.com> <530F7644.4040003@archlinux.org>
 <5310731F.2080701@gmail.com>
 <fc21bc26e7cacfef060f4f971ab233a6.squirrel@ssl.verfeiert.org>
 <20140228214601.GA23681@tansi.org>
 <517e087c5ca5b9ddb2669a60df76dd51.squirrel@ssl.verfeiert.org>
 <20140228232742.GA24931@tansi.org>
 <efa6ae0d61d5c8191398549351e4a882.squirrel@ssl.verfeiert.org>
 <53119BBB.4060006@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53119BBB.4060006@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] [ANNOUNCE] cryptsetup 1.6.4
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de

On 01.03.2014, Milan Broz wrote: 

> (I would say - this is a good lesson to think why there are safe defaults
> and why you should not change encryption parameters without good reason :-)

It's not always the facts which leads to action, but the peoples
assumptions and beliefs. After all, there's a general disbelief in all
things the NSA put their fingers on. That said, it is not hard for me
to understand what people moves to use whirlpool over SHAx..