From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Add SPLL sharing support for DDI
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:56:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140303095608.GV3852@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGRCcRrmaE3OuePatcXp9aFHgRVzQ1Qf_s=ak+3b2+WRDA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:40:22PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2014-02-27 9:23 GMT-03:00 <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Write some theoretical SPLL sharing support for DDI. Currently that will
> > never happens since we never use SPLL for anything but FDI. But having
> > the code there makes it easier if we ever want to do it, and it might
> > excercise the PLL sharing code a bit more.
>
> One thing is that if we ever want to use SSC on eDP/DP/HDMI, we will
> want to use either SPLL or WRPLL instead of LCPLL. I always wanted to
> implement this, and recently I saw a bug that made me think about it
> again.
>
> So instead of this patch, why don't you write support to use SSC when
> requested? We could do this through some i915.use_ssc command line
> option that would just try to force SSC on everything, or maybe a
> "debug connector property", or debugfs, or anything you might want.
> With this, you would be able to actually test your patches, and we'd
> have a useful feature.
>
> If you disagree, please just say "no" and then I'll go back to review
> this patch :)
I think improving the PLL selection code should be a separate patch.
IIRC I even said as much in the cover letter.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 12:23 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: FDI port_clock fix for DDI and other FDI changes ville.syrjala
2014-02-27 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Fix DDI port_clock for VGA output ville.syrjala
2014-02-28 22:09 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-03 10:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-02-27 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Change intel_fdi_link_freq() to 10kHz ville.syrjala
2014-02-28 22:28 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-01 7:34 ` Chris Wilson
2014-03-05 15:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-06 21:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-27 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Use DIV_ROUND_UP() when calculating number of required FDI lanes ville.syrjala
2014-02-28 22:35 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-27 12:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Use port_clock for FDI frequency on DDI ville.syrjala
2014-02-27 12:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Add SPLL sharing support for DDI ville.syrjala
2014-02-28 21:40 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-03 9:56 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2014-03-05 15:09 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140303095608.GV3852@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.