From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754584AbaCCPGb (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:06:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6210 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753855AbaCCPGa (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:06:30 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:05:31 -0500 From: Don Zickus To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Andi Kleen , acme@ghostprotocols.net, LKML , jolsa@redhat.com, jmario@redhat.com, fowles@inreach.com, eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Mike Galbraith , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Richard Fowles Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/19] perf c2c: Shared data analyser Message-ID: <20140303150531.GZ25953@redhat.com> References: <1393609388-40489-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1393609388-40489-9-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <87lhwvawc4.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20140228194642.GM25953@redhat.com> <1393621411.2899.39.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1393621411.2899.39.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 01:03:31PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 14:46 -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:08:59AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Don Zickus writes: > > > > + > > > > +static const struct perf_evsel_str_handler handlers[] = { > > > > + { "cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/pp", perf_c2c__process_load, }, > > > > + { "cpu/mem-stores/pp", perf_c2c__process_store, }, > > > > > Hmm I'm getting this when running a simple record command. > > invalid or unsupported event: 'cpu/mem-loads/pp' > > This only occurs with c2c, other subcommands work normally. It's as if > it were an old kernel, but it's Linus' latest. Is this an issue with the > patch or something I'm missing? > > Furthermore, I see: > ls /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/events > branch-instructions branch-misses cache-misses cache-references cpu-cycles instructions mem-loads Hmm, so based on Andi's reply, I am assuming you are running on a Westmere (or Nehalem) due to the lack of mem-stores. If you don't have mem-stores, this tool isn't going to work. The tool can only detect contention when sampling reads _and_ writes to the same addresses. Cheers, Don