Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] x86: IOSF: Change IOSF_MBI Kconfig to default y

["David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:07:29PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote:
> > From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Make the IOSF Mailbox driver built in as it provides core functionality needed
> > for new Intel SOC platforms to access the device registers on the SOC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig |    7 ++-----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index d3b1f8b..e34b252 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -2385,12 +2385,9 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP
> >  	depends on STA2X11
> >  
> >  config IOSF_MBI
> > -	bool
> > +	bool "Intel IOSF Mailbox Driver support"
> 
> One concern here is, IOSF is not architectural for all of X86, can we
> change this as "Intel Atom IOSF Mailbox Driver support"? Or if you can
> confirm we'll use IOSF in the future onchip product, can we change this
> as "Intel SOC IOSF Mailbox Driver support"?
> 

Ok. The latter would be more appropriate.

david box