From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C48B152986 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 19:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s25JtSK5006963 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:55:28 -0600 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlemailx.itg.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s25JtSdg010906 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:55:28 -0600 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:55:27 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s25JtRkD021890; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:55:27 -0600 Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:55:27 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Nelson, Sam" Message-ID: <20140305195527.GC22125@edge> References: <1393802295-7212-1-git-send-email-sam.nelson@ti.com> <20140305030635.GT22125@edge> <4F9216F96E5DF9428610502835A9F49057F4C2B9@DLEE11.ent.ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F9216F96E5DF9428610502835A9F49057F4C2B9@DLEE11.ent.ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-arago@arago-project.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] arago.conf: Update preferred version of binutils to 2.23.1 X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:55:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Normally, yes, those would be better places for preferences. But, in case of the toolchain components, it's not that simple... I would still like to know what you are trying to fix with this. As far as I can see, 2.23.1 is already being set as a default binutils version in Dylan. Are you seeing an error or a warning w/o this? On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:41:55PM -0500, Nelson, Sam wrote: > I guess the arago-prefs.inc or branding-xyz.inc is the right place. Please > ignore this patch. > Sam > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dmytriyenko, Denys > > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 10:07 PM > > To: Nelson, Sam > > Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org > > Subject: Re: [meta-arago] [PATCH] arago.conf: Update preferred version of > > binutils to 2.23.1 > > > > What are you strying to fix here? Moreover, arago.conf is not the right place > > for that... > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 06:18:15PM -0500, Sam Nelson wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Sam Nelson > > > > > > --- > > > - 2.23.1 is available in oe-core/meta/recipes- > > devtools/binutils/binutils_2.23.1.bb > > > --- > > > --- > > > meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf b/meta-arago- > > distro/conf/distro/arago.conf > > > index 76254f2..a789e89 100644 > > > --- a/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf > > > +++ b/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf > > > @@ -70,3 +70,5 @@ LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST = "commercial_gst- > > ffmpeg" > > > PACKAGE_ARCH := "${TUNE_PKGARCH}-${PREFERRED_VERSION_linux- > > libc-headers}" > > > # Need to include the new PACKAGE_ARCH to the PACKAGE_ARCHS > > variable > > > PACKAGE_ARCHS += "${TUNE_PKGARCH}-${PREFERRED_VERSION_linux- > > libc-headers}" > > > + > > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils = "2.23.1" > > > -- > > > 1.7.9.5 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > meta-arago mailing list > > > meta-arago@arago-project.org > > > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago