All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: is printk() safe within a timekeeper_seq write section?
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:45:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140306174531.GA30634@midget.suse.cz> (raw)

Hi,

I'm looking at the printk call in
__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(), introduced in cb5de2f8
(time: Catch invalid timespec sleep values in __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime)

Is it safe to call printk() while timekeeper_seq is held for
writing?

What about this call chain?
  printk
    vprintk_emit
      console_unlock
        up(&console_sem)
          __up
	    wake_up_process
	      try_to_wake_up
	        ttwu_do_activate
		  ttwu_activate
		    activate_task
		      enqueue_task
		        enqueue_task_fair
			  hrtick_update
			    hrtick_start_fair
			      hrtick_start_fair
			        get_time
				  ktime_get
				    --> endless loop on
				    read_seqcount_retry(&timekeeper_seq, ...)
		  

It looks like an unlikely but possible deadlock. 
Or did I overlook something?

Thanks!

-- 
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ


             reply	other threads:[~2014-03-06 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-06 17:45 Jiri Bohac [this message]
2014-03-11 19:29 ` is printk() safe within a timekeeper_seq write section? John Stultz
2014-03-11 21:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-11 21:54     ` John Stultz
2014-03-12  6:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12  9:21       ` Jiri Bohac
2014-03-28  0:49         ` John Stultz
2014-03-12  6:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 14:34       ` Jan Kara
2014-03-12 15:06         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-14 15:13           ` Jan Kara
2014-03-12 13:13     ` Jan Kara
2014-03-12  9:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12  9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140306174531.GA30634@midget.suse.cz \
    --to=jbohac@suse.cz \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.