From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:52066 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751896AbaCHRSD (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Mar 2014 12:18:03 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Liviu Dudau Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] pci: OF: Fix the conversion of IO ranges into IO resources. Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 18:17:39 +0100 Cc: "linux-pci" , Bjorn Helgaas , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "linaro-kernel" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , LKML , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , LAKML , Tanmay Inamdar References: <1394020137-1830-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1394020137-1830-3-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1394020137-1830-3-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <201403081817.39810.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday 05 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote: > + unsigned long port = -1; > + if (!pci_register_io_range(range->cpu_addr, range->size)) > + port = pci_address_to_pio(range->cpu_addr); I don't remember the outcome of my suggestion to just return 'port' from pci_register_io_range(). In my mind that would be much simpler than adding the range in a data structure just so we can look it up in the very next line. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 18:17:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v6 2/6] pci: OF: Fix the conversion of IO ranges into IO resources. In-Reply-To: <1394020137-1830-3-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> References: <1394020137-1830-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1394020137-1830-3-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Message-ID: <201403081817.39810.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 05 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote: > + unsigned long port = -1; > + if (!pci_register_io_range(range->cpu_addr, range->size)) > + port = pci_address_to_pio(range->cpu_addr); I don't remember the outcome of my suggestion to just return 'port' from pci_register_io_range(). In my mind that would be much simpler than adding the range in a data structure just so we can look it up in the very next line. Arnd