From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:22:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] perf: ARM64: wire up perf_regs and unwind support In-Reply-To: <20140313101202.GB11365@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1392311193-21214-1-git-send-email-jean.pihet@linaro.org> <20140312174520.GB17308@arm.com> <20140313101202.GB11365@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <20140313102203.GC30339@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:12:02AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:45:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: > > > On 13 February 2014 18:06, Jean Pihet wrote: > > > > This patch hooks in the perf_regs and libunwind code for ARM64. > > > > The tools/perf/arch/arm64 is created; it contains the arch specific > > > > code for DWARF unwinding. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet > > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > > > > > Ping on this patch. Can this one go into the perf tree? > > > > I'm happy to take it as well if there are no objections from the perf > > maintainers. > > I object :) Last time I took a patch for perf tools (via the arm tree) it > ended in a conflict from hell and we vowed not to take tools patches via > arch trees again. Works for me ;) -- Catalin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754169AbaCMKWW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 06:22:22 -0400 Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:42376 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753791AbaCMKWU (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 06:22:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:22:03 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Will Deacon Cc: Jean Pihet , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Arnaldo , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Patch Tracking Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: ARM64: wire up perf_regs and unwind support Message-ID: <20140313102203.GC30339@arm.com> References: <1392311193-21214-1-git-send-email-jean.pihet@linaro.org> <20140312174520.GB17308@arm.com> <20140313101202.GB11365@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140313101202.GB11365@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:12:02AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:45:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: > > > On 13 February 2014 18:06, Jean Pihet wrote: > > > > This patch hooks in the perf_regs and libunwind code for ARM64. > > > > The tools/perf/arch/arm64 is created; it contains the arch specific > > > > code for DWARF unwinding. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet > > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > > > > > Ping on this patch. Can this one go into the perf tree? > > > > I'm happy to take it as well if there are no objections from the perf > > maintainers. > > I object :) Last time I took a patch for perf tools (via the arm tree) it > ended in a conflict from hell and we vowed not to take tools patches via > arch trees again. Works for me ;) -- Catalin