From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753962AbaCMLB1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:01:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:62221 "EHLO mail-ee0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753494AbaCMLBZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:01:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:01:21 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Catalin Marinas Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, acme@ghostprotocols.net, jean.pihet@linaro.org, jolsa@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] ARM64, perf: Add support for perf registers API Message-ID: <20140313110121.GA9816@gmail.com> References: <1391451509-31265-2-git-send-email-jean.pihet@linaro.org> <20140313101907.GC17308@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140313101907.GC17308@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:27:45AM -0700, tip-bot for Jean Pihet wrote: > > Commit-ID: 1acfb01a43db9d8cde2d4c1d51746bae0b46b06b > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1acfb01a43db9d8cde2d4c1d51746bae0b46b06b > > Author: Jean Pihet > > AuthorDate: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:18:27 +0100 > > Committer: Ingo Molnar > > CommitDate: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:45:28 +0100 > > > > ARM64, perf: Add support for perf registers API > > > > This patch implements the functions required for the perf > > registers API, allowing the perf tool to interface kernel > > register dumps with libunwind in order to provide userspace > > backtracing. Compat mode is also supported. > > > > Only the general purpose user space registers are exported, > > i.e.: PERF_REG_ARM_X0, > > ... > > PERF_REG_ARM_X28, > > PERF_REG_ARM_FP, > > PERF_REG_ARM_LR, > > PERF_REG_ARM_SP, > > PERF_REG_ARM_PC > > and not the PERF_REG_ARM_V* registers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > Cc: Arnaldo > > Cc: Jiri Olsa > > Cc: patches@linaro.org > > Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391451509-31265-2-git-send-email-jean.pihet@linaro.org > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > > --- > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 1 + > > arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 1 + > > arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 6 files changed, 89 insertions(+) > > As I replied to Jean yesterday, I merged the arch/arm64 patches already > in the arm64 tree. Is it late to drop them from tip (and avoid potential > conflicts)? > > But please take the perf tools patch (tools/perf/arch/arm64/...). Well, I merged them so that the tooling bits can be tested on top of that and merged as well. Anyway, I dropped them, they were still the tail of tip:perf/core. Thanks, Ingo