From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: do not allow read-only=on and snapshot=on to be used together
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:40:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140314124009.GA9540@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140312111604.GD2662@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:16:04PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 24.01.2014 um 14:48 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:33:19PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 14.01.2014 um 20:12 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> > > > Having both read-only=on and snapshot=on together does not make sense;
> > > > currently, the read-only argument is effectively ignored for the
> > > > temporary snapshot. To prevent confusion, disallow the usage of both
> > > > 'snapshot=on' and 'read-only=on'.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > This breaks in a surprising way:
> > >
> > > $ softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -drive file=~/images/hd.img,snapshot=on
> > > ... works fine ...
> > >
> > > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -drive file=~/images/hd.img -snapshot
> > > qemu-system-x86_64: invalid option combination: read-only and snapshot
> > >
> > > qemu-iotests case 051 catches this. I'll have to remove this patch and
> > > the follow-up from the queue for now.
> > >
> >
> > Odd - OK, I'll follow up on this and submit a series with both patches
> > (well, likely squashed together), and whatever is needed to fix this
> > as well.
>
> Jeff, what happened with this? I found the two patches in an old git
> branch and wondered why they didn't disappear in the rebase. But
> apparently we still allow read-only and snapshot at the same time.
>
The test case 051 failed because when -snapshot was specified, it was
enabled for all the default drives as well, which included
default_cdrom.
The solutions for that seemed a little hacky, and I wasn't sure it was
actually worth it, given that this is probably not a real problem to
begin with. If you think it is worth it, I can resurrect the patch
and make sure it works with both snapshot=on and -snapshot.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-14 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 19:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: do not allow read-only=on and snapshot=on to be used together Jeff Cody
2014-01-14 19:30 ` Eric Blake
2014-01-16 7:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-01-16 9:39 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-01-16 19:20 ` Jeff Cody
2014-01-17 17:01 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-01-24 13:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-01-24 13:48 ` Jeff Cody
2014-03-12 11:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-03-14 12:40 ` Jeff Cody [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140314124009.GA9540@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.