From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:49:30 +0100 Subject: leds-atmel-pwm and atmel-pwm-bl removal Message-ID: <20140314194930.GF3106@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, With the new generic pwm framework and the pwm-atmel driver using it, we don't need leds-atmel-pwm or atmel-pwm-bl anymore. However, a few boards are still using those: arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9263ek.c arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c arch/avr32/boards/atngw100/mrmt.c arch/avr32/boards/merisc/setup.c arch/avr32/boards/favr-32/setup.c Some other avr32 boards are compiling it as a module but don't seem to make any use of it. I will take care of the mach-at91 boards and I can test on those. I can do the same for the avr32 boards but I won't be able to test (only to compile). Is anyone of you interested in testing those changes ? I couldn't reach the initial authors of those files... Could we simply remove the driver from the avr32 boards ? I'm under the impression that they don't get much interest anyway, since april 2009, I only see tree wide changes and I can't believe they didn't get broken a way or another. Regards, -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754791AbaCNTtd (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:49:33 -0400 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:50500 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750757AbaCNTtc (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:49:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:49:30 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Hans-Christian Egtvedt , Haavard Skinnemoen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre Subject: leds-atmel-pwm and atmel-pwm-bl removal Message-ID: <20140314194930.GF3106@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, With the new generic pwm framework and the pwm-atmel driver using it, we don't need leds-atmel-pwm or atmel-pwm-bl anymore. However, a few boards are still using those: arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9263ek.c arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c arch/avr32/boards/atngw100/mrmt.c arch/avr32/boards/merisc/setup.c arch/avr32/boards/favr-32/setup.c Some other avr32 boards are compiling it as a module but don't seem to make any use of it. I will take care of the mach-at91 boards and I can test on those. I can do the same for the avr32 boards but I won't be able to test (only to compile). Is anyone of you interested in testing those changes ? I couldn't reach the initial authors of those files... Could we simply remove the driver from the avr32 boards ? I'm under the impression that they don't get much interest anyway, since april 2009, I only see tree wide changes and I can't believe they didn't get broken a way or another. Regards, -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com