From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: OMAP4 SDP regression... Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:35:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20140318013507.GD30471@atomide.com> References: <20140317233229.GP21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:65417 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752147AbaCRBfM (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:35:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140317233229.GP21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Markus Pargmann , Mark Brown * Russell King - ARM Linux [140317 16:35]: > There's been a couple of regressions on OMAP4430 SDP I've only recently > noticed: > > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/build/result.php?type=boot&idx=1597 > > Configuring network interfaces... udhcpc (v1.9.1) started > Sending discover... > Sending discover... > Sending discover... > No lease, failing > done. > > No link lights come up either. The hardware is fine because uboot manages > to successfully tftp the kernel. > > It looks like it was working in -rc4+armsoc and -rc5+armsoc, but not > -rc6+armsoc. > > From what I can see, nothing has changed in drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ > since rc5. > > I've been through the delta from 3.14-rc5, and I don't see anything > obvious. Any ideas? Known problem? Seems like plain v3.14-rc6 fails for me while -rc5 works. Bisecting points to: 66fda75f regulator: core: Replace direct ops->disable usage Also verified that v3.14-rc6 with 66fda75f reverted also works. Markus & Mark, any ideas? Regards, Tony