[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] usb, dfu: extract flush code into seperate function

[Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>]

Hi Marek,

> On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 at 01:35:47 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> > 
> > > On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 at 07:51:05 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > > Hi Marek,
> > > > 
> > > > > On Monday, March 17, 2014 at 11:56:16 AM, Heiko Schocher
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > move the flushing code into an extra function dfu_flush(),
> > > > > > so it can be used from other code.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> > > > > > Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > > > > > Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > 
> > > > > > @@ -199,23 +221,7 @@ int dfu_write(struct dfu_entity *dfu,
> > > > > > void *buf, int size, int blk_seq_num)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  	/* end? */
> > > > > >  	if (size == 0) {
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -		/* Now try and flush to the medium if
> > > > > > needed. */
> > > > > > -		if (dfu->flush_medium)
> > > > > > -			ret = dfu->flush_medium(dfu);
> > > > > > -		printf("\nDFU complete CRC32: 0x%08x\n",
> > > > > > dfu->crc); -
> > > > > > -		/* clear everything */
> > > > > > -		dfu_free_buf();
> > > > > > -		dfu->crc = 0;
> > > > > > -		dfu->offset = 0;
> > > > > > -		dfu->i_blk_seq_num = 0;
> > > > > > -		dfu->i_buf_start = dfu_buf;
> > > > > > -		dfu->i_buf_end = dfu_buf;
> > > > > > -		dfu->i_buf = dfu->i_buf_start;
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > -		dfu->inited = 0;
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > -	}
> > > > > > +		ret = dfu_flush(dfu, buf, size,
> > > > > > blk_seq_num);
> > > > > 
> > > > > This seems broken, at least because you didn't close the
> > > > > opened brace (see 'if (size == 0) {' .... I can fix this up
> > > > > when applying.
> > > > 
> > > > I was prepared to pull those patches to u-boot-dfu repo today
> > > > and test them :-).
> > > > 
> > > > Afterwards, I would send PR to Tom.
> > > > 
> > > > Are you OK with this?
> > > 
> > > Doesn't -dfu go through -usb ? ;-)
> > 
> > As fair as I remember the dfu code from ./drivers/dfu/* shall go via
> > u-boot-dfu tree directly to Tom.
> > 
> > > Or do you want to send to Tom
> > > directly ? Either way WFM.
> > 
> > After writing the other message you waited for a response less than
> > one minute :-).
> > 
> > > Nonetheless, I picked the patches via
> > > -usb, they're in master now.
> > 
> > I've just tested them and they doesn't cause any regression.
> > 
> > Would you be so kind and apply one more patch, which was supposed to
> > go with u-boot-dfu PR (this patch waits for submission from
> > 21.02.2014)?
> > 
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/322450/
> 
> OK, picked and pushed. I think panto picked it up as well tho, but
> maybe I unleashed too much mental terror unto him with my OvisLink
> WL-1100SD that he is paralyzed by it ;-) Panto, I will pick this
> patch, OK ?

This patch looks like a little orphan :-). I'm glad that someone pull
it finally.

> 
> As for the DFU, what do we do about the PRs ? DFU is part of USB, so
> I shall logically pick the PRs from you and move them to trini, but
> if you're unhappy about this, we need to talk about that. Tom,
> Lukasz ... thoughts ?

I'm fine with sending PRs to you.


-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group