From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: [Xen-users] substantial shutdown delay for PV guests with PCI -passthrough Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:53:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20140320135309.GU3200@reaktio.net> References: <1395137709.12847.29.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5328439B.8050807@web2web.at> <1395155249.12847.66.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5328E403.8010506@web2web.at> <1395228384.10203.65.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <20140319130002.GC8694@phenom.dumpdata.com> <5329A3C0.3000609@web2web.at> <21289.48007.604643.322509@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <532A530D.1050504@web2web.at> <21290.54937.269235.163107@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21290.54937.269235.163107@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Roger Pau Monne , Ian Campbell , xen-devel , Atom2 , xen-users@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:52:57AM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Atom2 writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] substantial shutdown delay for PV guests with PCI -passthrough"): > > the patch unfortunately doesn't apply to my sources - some comments to > > the reasons why further below. > > Here's a backport. I have compiled but not executed it. > > > Sorry for my delay in answering - this is a resend as the first e-Mail > > with uncompressed attachments did not go through. > > > Just FYI: the version I am using is 4.3.1-r5; I have attached the > > relevant source files referred to by your patches. > > Thanks, but our revision control system enables us to retrieve old > versions very easily :-). So there is not any need to provide us with > these files. > > Having said that, I have no record of 4.3.1-rc5. But I'm pretty sure > the patch below, which is against staging-4.3, will apply to your > tree. It applies cleanly to 4.3.0-rc5 and 4.3.1-rc2, which are my two > guesses as to which version you mean. > Often "r5" style versions refer to Gentoo packaging.. So maybe he actually didn't have a typo in 4.3.1-r5 :) -- Pasi