From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mailout3.w2.samsung.com ([211.189.100.13]:44171 "EHLO usmailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750733AbaCURvH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:51:07 -0400 Received: from uscpsbgm2.samsung.com (u115.gpu85.samsung.co.kr [203.254.195.115]) by usmailout3.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0N2S008VOS951E70@usmailout3.samsung.com> for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:51:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:51:01 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Frank =?UTF-8?B?U2Now6RmZXI=?= Cc: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: xc2038/3028 firmware Message-id: <20140321145101.1d897b0f@samsung.com> In-reply-to: <532C7581.2080503@googlemail.com> References: <532C7581.2080503@googlemail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:23:13 +0100 Frank Schäfer escreveu: > Hi, > > are there any reasons why the xc2028/3028 firmware files are not > included in the linux-firmware tree ? > The xc5000 firmware is already there, so it seems Xceive|has nothing > against| redistribution of their firmware... ?! They explicitly granted redistribution rights to xc5000 firmware, but they never gave for xc2028/3028. Regards, Mauro