From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754143AbaCXU5d (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:57:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35859 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753559AbaCXU5c (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:57:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:57:05 -0400 From: Don Zickus To: acme@ghostprotocols.net Cc: LKML , jolsa@redhat.com, jmario@redhat.com, fowles@inreach.com, peterz@infradead.org, eranian@google.com, andi.kleen@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15 V3] perf: Fix stddev calculation Message-ID: <20140324205705.GE25953@redhat.com> References: <1395689676-214799-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1395694478-220482-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1395694478-220482-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:54:38PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > The stddev calculation written matched standard error. As a result when > using this result to find the relative stddev between runs, it was not > accurate. > This isn't the patch I that had my updates... Sorry for the noise. Cheers, Don