From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow user modes to exceed DVI 165MHz limit
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:03:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140327110331.GQ21652@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140327093736.GA30820@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:37:36AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:08:45AM +0200, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > So relax the checks a bit, and apply the single-link DVI dotclock limit
> > only when filtering the mode list, and ignore the limit when setting
> > a user specified mode.
>
> Mind enlightening me as to how this actually works? I thought all
> display modes were validated before we used them, so how come this
> sneaks through?
>
> So it goes like this:
>
> userspace calls GETCONNECTOR
> kernel: fill_modes -> drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes -> mode_valid?
>
> but
>
> userspace calls SETCRTC with a random mode
> kernel: applies random mode without validation
>
> Seriously we don't do any checking that the mode given to SETCRTC is
> applicable and not in any way harmful before setting registers?
Pretty much. Calling our user mode validation even "minimal" is a bit
of a stretch. And the checks we have in the .mode_valid() hooks are
lacking as well.
As far as this particular patch goes, we do check the port clock in the
hdmi compute_config hook, so I had to relax it a bit to ignore the single
link DVI limit there, and instead just check it against the hardware
specific limit from BSpec. I think that's a reasonable thing to do. If
we wanted to protect the user (or the equipment in case of CRTs) more,
we should probably check things against the EDID min/max scan rates and
max clock.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-27 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 9:08 [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow user modes to exceed DVI 165MHz limit ville.syrjala
2014-03-27 9:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2014-03-27 11:03 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2014-03-27 13:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-11 14:28 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140327110331.GQ21652@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.