Re: [PATCH 00/16] move at91 and avr32 to the PWM framework, remove obsolete drivers

[Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>]

Hi,

On 27/03/2014 at 18:43:26 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
> On 19/03/2014 14:03, Alexandre Belloni :
> > Alexandre Belloni (16):
> >   ARM: at91: at91sam9g45: switch to generic PWM framework
> >   ARM: at91: sam9m10g45ek: use generic leds_pwm driver
> >   ARM: at91: at91sam9263: switch to generic PWM framework
> >   ARM: at91: sam9263ek: use generic leds_pwm driver
> >   ARM: at91: at91sam9rl: switch to generic PWM framework
> >   ARM: at91: remove useless at91_pwm_leds()
> >   PWM: atmel: allow building for AVR32
> >   backlight: pwm_bl: set pwm polarity when using platform data

Please wait for Thierry Reding to comment on this one...

> >   avr32/at32ap: switch to the generic PWM framework
> >   avr32: MRMT: use generic leds_pwm driver
> >   avr32: merisc: use generic leds_pwm driver
> >   avr32: favr-32: use generic pwm_bl driver
> >   avr32: update defconfig to use the generic PWM framework
> >   backlight: atmel-pwm-bl: remove obsolete driver
> >   leds: atmel-pwm: remove obsolete driver

...watch out for the small typo (pawm-atmel) I made there...

> >   misc: atmel_pwm: remove obsolete driver
> 
> I am fine with the whole series. For the AT91 specific bits, you can add my:
> 
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> 
> It is a very nice cleanup and I can take the series with me in the AT91
> git tree (likely the at91-3.16-cleanup or at91-3.16-drivers branch) if
> everybody agree.
> 

... but I believe you can take it through your tree as it mostly depends
on AT91 and Hans-Christian seemed fine with the modifications on avr32.

Regards,

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com