From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 01:22:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Kirkwood DT Documentation In-Reply-To: <20140324002233.GZ15608@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1395492360-1865-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <20140324002233.GZ15608@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <201403290122.24713.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 24 March 2014, Jason Cooper wrote: > arm-soc maintainers, > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 01:45:55PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > This patchset fixes up a number of issues found by checkpatch in the > > kirkwood DT files or binding Documentation. Vendor Prefixes are > > documented, missing prefixes are added, incorrect prefixes are > > corrected, and Kirkwood SoCs are documented. > > > > Note that some of these patches contain UTF-8 characters, which the > > mailing lists sometime don't like. The patches can also be found in > > > > https://github.com/lunn/linux.git v3.14-rc7-next-20140321-dt > > > > which is based on linux-next tag next-20140321. > > I'd like to take this in as 'fixes-non-critical' for v3.15. However, > I'm having trouble finding a stable, conflict-free branch to base it on. > The main problem seems to be vendor-prefixes.txt. > > How would you prefer I handle this? Or, would you guys just like to > take the series directly? I'm fine either way. > > If taking directly, > > Acked-by: Jason Cooper I think Rob should take the binding changes, we can take the dts file changes. Can you send them as patches relative to the next/dt branch to arm at kernel.org? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Kirkwood DT Documentation Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 01:22:24 +0100 Message-ID: <201403290122.24713.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1395492360-1865-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <20140324002233.GZ15608@titan.lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140324002233.GZ15608-u4khhh1J0LxI1Ri9qeTfzeTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Cooper Cc: Andrew Lunn , Olof Johansson , Kevin Hilman , arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Device Tree , linux ARM , robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Monday 24 March 2014, Jason Cooper wrote: > arm-soc maintainers, > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 01:45:55PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > This patchset fixes up a number of issues found by checkpatch in the > > kirkwood DT files or binding Documentation. Vendor Prefixes are > > documented, missing prefixes are added, incorrect prefixes are > > corrected, and Kirkwood SoCs are documented. > > > > Note that some of these patches contain UTF-8 characters, which the > > mailing lists sometime don't like. The patches can also be found in > > > > https://github.com/lunn/linux.git v3.14-rc7-next-20140321-dt > > > > which is based on linux-next tag next-20140321. > > I'd like to take this in as 'fixes-non-critical' for v3.15. However, > I'm having trouble finding a stable, conflict-free branch to base it on. > The main problem seems to be vendor-prefixes.txt. > > How would you prefer I handle this? Or, would you guys just like to > take the series directly? I'm fine either way. > > If taking directly, > > Acked-by: Jason Cooper I think Rob should take the binding changes, we can take the dts file changes. Can you send them as patches relative to the next/dt branch to arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html