From: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc: "Greg KH (gregkh@linuxfoundation.org)"
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz>
Subject: Re: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:58:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140402135812.GI3339@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B1AFAE58E@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1440 bytes --]
Hi Tomas,
bad news, we just had failed boot with 3.10.35 with your patch:
last line was:
mei_me 0000:00:16.0: wait hw ready failed. status = -110
so it can probably happen that boot hangs on mei_me init attempt..
colleague just told me it also happened to him with 3.13 kernel,
however I don't have more info on that case..
if I can provide more information, please let me know.
BR
nik
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:05:20PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Tomas,
> >
> > > If this is a server platform can you please try this patch
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/396
> >
> > tried 3.10.35 with Your patch and now I can see following in dmesg:
> >
> > [ +0.000290] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: Device doesn't have valid ME Interface
> > [ +0.007656] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: initialization failed.
> >
> > now reboot works as expected. Once this hits ustream (if it hasn't already),
> > this could go to -stable, do You agree?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> I definitely asked for adding it to stable. Would you wish to add you tested-by to the patch?.
> Tomas
>
>
--
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28.rijna 168, 709 00 Ostrava
tel.: +420 591 166 214
fax: +420 596 621 273
mobil: +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz
mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@linuxbox.cz
-------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-02 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-10 14:55 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot? Nikola Ciprich
2014-03-29 12:15 ` Nikola Ciprich
2014-03-29 20:37 ` Winkler, Tomas
2014-03-31 12:01 ` Nikola Ciprich
2014-03-31 12:05 ` Winkler, Tomas
2014-03-31 12:11 ` Nikola Ciprich
2014-04-02 13:58 ` Nikola Ciprich [this message]
2014-04-02 14:27 ` Winkler, Tomas
2014-04-02 14:36 ` Nikola Ciprich
2014-04-07 13:10 ` Winkler, Tomas
2014-04-07 13:25 ` Nikola Ciprich
2014-04-07 19:01 ` Winkler, Tomas
2014-04-08 6:49 ` Nikola Ciprich
2014-04-08 6:56 ` Winkler, Tomas
2014-04-08 7:00 ` Nikola Ciprich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140402135812.GI3339@pcnci.linuxbox.cz \
--to=nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.