From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lauri Kasanen Subject: Required backwards support level? Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 15:26:15 +0300 Message-ID: <20140406152616.a7b22a4e.cand@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0EE6E397 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 05:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Valinor ([84.248.177.169]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Lbujs-1XG2Ws2KpA-00jGCO for ; Sun, 06 Apr 2014 14:25:46 +0200 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Hi, Obviously old userspace + new kernel combo needs to be supported. But I'm not so sure about a mixed case, does old userspace + new userspace need to be supported to run at the same time? For example, a new 64-bit mesa+libdrm and a 32-bit old set, both running apps at the same time. Or is it acceptable to assume that once a new userspace has been run, an old one won't be run for this boot? - Lauri