From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754577AbaDFS7R (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Apr 2014 14:59:17 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56837 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754410AbaDFS7Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Apr 2014 14:59:16 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 12:01:45 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Joel Pelaez Jorge Cc: Silvan Jegen , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: rtl8192e: Fix sparse warning Message-ID: <20140406190145.GB30469@kroah.com> References: <5341A05A.5080403@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5341A05A.5080403@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 01:43:38PM -0500, Joel Pelaez Jorge wrote: > Fix a sparse warning, non static symbol is no declared as such. > And fix a conflict with static function declared extern to include > rtl_wx.h header. > > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c:1323:24: warning: > symbol 'r8192_wx_handlers_def' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Joel Pelaez Jorge > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c > b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c > index 498995d..f17584d 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > > #include > #include "rtl_core.h" > +#include "rtl_wx.h" Why is this needed? > > #define RATE_COUNT 12 > static u32 rtl8192_rates[] = { > @@ -1293,7 +1294,7 @@ static iw_handler r8192_private_handler[] = { > (iw_handler)r8192_wx_get_PromiscuousMode, > }; > > -static struct iw_statistics *r8192_get_wireless_stats(struct net_device > *dev) > +struct iw_statistics *r8192_get_wireless_stats(struct net_device *dev) Why make this global? This doesn't have anything to do with the warning you are working on as described above. totally confused, greg k-h