From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] leds: leds-pwm: implement PWM inversion
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:46:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140407084651.GA30127@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1WWvQI-00049e-Vl@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2067 bytes --]
(adding Thierry Reding)
Hi,
On 06/04/2014 at 23:20:18 +0100, Russell King wrote :
> Some PWM outputs are wired such that the LED they're controlling is
> connected to supply rather than ground. These PWMs may not support
> output inversion, or when they do, disabling the PWM may set the
> PWM output low, causing a "brightness" value of zero to turn the LED
> fully on.
>
> The platform data for this driver already indicates that this was
> thought about, and we have the "active_low" property there already.
> However, the implementation for this is missing.
>
> Add the trivial implementation for this feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> index e1b4c23a409a..1d47742c551f 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ static void led_pwm_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
>
> duty *= brightness;
> do_div(duty, max);
> +
> + if (led_dat->active_low)
> + duty = led_dat->period - duty;
> +
> led_dat->duty = duty;
>
This will conflict with my patch (which is still lacking proper review)
there:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.leds/482
I would say that it is better to hide the polarity inversion in the PWM
driver for your specific PWM. Else we will end up with all the drivers
using PWMs trying to detect whether the PWM supports inversion and if it
is not the case, calculating the inverted duty cycle.
So, I would go for my patch which is adding the missing polarity
inversion setting when using platform data and then implement software
polarity inversion in your underlying PWM driver. That also avoids patch
5/5 and I believe not adding a DT property is always a good idea.
What is your PWM that is not supporting polarity inversion ?
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-07 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-06 22:18 [PATCH 0/5] Fix various issues with leds-pwm Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-06 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] leds: leds-pwm: properly clean up after probe failure Russell King
2014-04-06 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] leds: leds-pwm: provide a common function to setup a single led-pwm device Russell King
2014-04-06 22:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] leds: leds-pwm: convert OF parsing code to use led_pwm_add() Russell King
2014-04-06 22:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] leds: leds-pwm: implement PWM inversion Russell King
2014-04-07 8:46 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2014-04-07 8:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-07 9:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-04-07 9:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-07 11:10 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-07 11:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-07 12:01 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-07 12:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-07 13:37 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-07 14:20 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-04-07 15:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-06 22:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] leds: leds-pwm: add DT support for LEDs wired to supply Russell King
2014-04-07 21:31 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix various issues with leds-pwm Bryan Wu
2014-04-07 21:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-07 21:36 ` Bryan Wu
2014-06-12 17:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-12 17:37 ` Bryan Wu
2014-06-12 17:56 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-06-12 18:01 ` Bryan Wu
2014-06-12 18:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-12 18:16 ` Bryan Wu
2014-06-12 18:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140407084651.GA30127@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=cooloney@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.