From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com (bear.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.41]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600485299C for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 01:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by bear.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s3814oSd004046 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:04:50 -0500 Received: from DLEE71.ent.ti.com (dlee71.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.114]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3814oE6028692 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:04:50 -0500 Received: from dlep33.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.75) by DLEE71.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:04:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3814o9l032114 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:04:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 21:04:49 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "meta-arago@arago-project.org" Message-ID: <20140408010449.GE12929@edge> References: <20140310121416.GC4423@ad.chargestorm.se> <20140314161649.GD12929@edge> <20140321142643.GA1479@ad.chargestorm.se> <20140402075039.GA5988@ad.chargestorm.se> <20140407223700.GC12929@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140407223700.GC12929@edge> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Issue building gcc-cross-initial X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 01:04:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 06:37:01PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > Ok, it took me some time and effort (the error is severely misleading), but I > was finally able to trace down what causes the breakage in the internal > toolchain: > > http://arago-project.org/git/?p=meta-arago.git;a=commitdiff;h=e9797a456c99c890e5ff62334b7d65e1ff7db676 > > The addition of libc-headers version used for the platform into the > PACKAGE_ARCH causes gcc-cross-initial to not find binutils binaries during > bootstrap. > > I'm still trying to figure out if it would be possible to unbreak the build, > while keeping the change, but at least it should be possible to have a quick > workaround for now... And this seems to have resolved the issue: STAGING_BINDIR_TOOLCHAIN = "${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}${bindir_native}/${TUNE_PKGARCH}-${PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers}${TARGET_VENDOR}-${TARGET_OS}" Still testing it... > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:50:41AM +0200, Anders Darander wrote: > > Ping... > > > > * Anders Darander [140321 15:30]: > > > > > * Denys Dmytriyenko [140314 17:17]: > > > > > > Yeah, I'm seeing the same breakage even in dylan - I'm looking into it now... > > > > > Good to know that I'm not alone in seeing this... > > > > > Any ideas regarding the root cause or possible fixes? Sofar, I've been > > > occupied with work on our old release branch, though soon IÍ„'ll start > > > working on the update again. > > > > > Cheers, > > > Anders > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 01:14:28PM +0100, Anders Darander wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Summary: > > > > > > > I'm attempting at moving a custom product from meta-arago (danny) to the > > > > > latest master based on dora. > > > > > > > However, I'm getting issues when I'm building gcc-cross-initial (we're > > > > > not using an external toolchain).i > > > > > > > I've seen this on my normal build machine running Ubuntu 12.04, though > > > > > my example below was running a new OpenSuse machine. > > > > > The choice of MACHINE="am37x-evm" is made to get something resembling > > > > > our real machine. > > > > > > > When building gcc-cross-initial, libgcc fails to identify the "suffix of > > > > > object files" when the configure-script for libgcc is being run. > > > > > > > I hope that someone can help me with some ideas/pointers as to how this > > > > > can be resolved. I've got the same issue with both gcc 4.7.2 and > > > > > 4.8.1... > > -- > > Anders Darander > > ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB > _______________________________________________ > meta-arago mailing list > meta-arago@arago-project.org > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago