Re: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?

[Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1391 bytes --]

Hello Tomas,

> I'm not sure how this is possible that this is failing for you
> 
> if ((0xa301 & 0x600) == 0x200)
> 	goto no_mei; 
> so this is okay, the driver should not bind
> 
> How the patch worked for you before this test?  
> 
> Sorry for asking but can you please double check your compilation setup. 

You're right of course :-(

I tried rebuilding rpm again now, and patch spits following:

Hunk #1 succeeded at 105 (offset -2 lines).
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line

it's bad rpm build didn't abort at this point, but apparently
this is patch's fault:

[root@dev6 linux-3.10]# cat /tmp/mei/1 | patch -sp1
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
[root@dev6 linux-3.10]# echo $?
0

:-(

well, this sucks, I really wouldn't expect that kind of bug in such widely
used program as patch :(

I'll report that.

(btw this error was caused by one whitespace character at last line of patch)

anyways, You can certainly forgot about that, it was my fault :(

sorry about that

nik


>  
> Thanks
> Tomas
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28.rijna 168, 709 00 Ostrava

tel.:   +420 591 166 214
fax:    +420 596 621 273
mobil:  +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz

mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@linuxbox.cz
-------------------------------------

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]