From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:33:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:54511 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6822287AbaDINdFHkDsB (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:33:05 +0200 Received: from uucp (helo=solo.franken.de) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1WXscg-0001uW-00; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:33:02 +0200 Received: by solo.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 69FF01BB731; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:32:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:32:29 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Florian Lohoff Cc: Fengguang Wu , Michal Marek , kbuild-all@01.org, "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" Subject: Re: arch/mips/sgi-ip22/Platform:29: *** gcc doesn't support needed option -mr10k-cache-barrier=store. Stop. Message-ID: <20140409133229.GA22315@alpha.franken.de> References: <534138d9.RISUZQYUMS8U8s42%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20140409051929.GA29246@localhost> <20140409082445.GC1438@pax.zz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140409082445.GC1438@pax.zz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 39745 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:24:45AM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > Most likely they never made it into gcc upstream but they are > necessary working around the r10k speculative stores on non > cache coherent machines like the IP28. IMHO the patch went upstream judging from the incremental patches here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01371.html. Iirc it went into 4.4.0. Thomas -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]