All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:40:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409174024.GB22728@two.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409164852.GA22728@two.firstfloor.org>


BTW the whole discussion is rather pointless.

We have to profile the software as it is, not as we wish it to be.

That means: small functions, often no frame pointer, all kinds of crappy
code and missing information.

And then doing it all with as little overhead as possible.

I think on these metrics callstack LBR is attractive for many
(but not all) cases.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-09 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18  6:07 [PATCH v3 00/14] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] perf, core: pmu specific data for perf task context Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] perf, core: always switch pmu specific data during context switch Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] perf, x86: track number of events that use LBR callstack Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] perf, x86: allocate space for storing LBR stack Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] perf, core: simplify need branch stack check Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] perf, core: Pass perf_sample_data to perf_callchain() Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] perf, x86: use LBR call stack to get user callchain Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] perf, x86: enable LBR callstack when recording callchain Yan, Zheng
2014-02-18  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack Yan, Zheng
2014-02-23 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support Stephane Eranian
2014-02-24  1:07   ` Yan, Zheng
2014-02-24  7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-26  2:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-26  7:04   ` Stephane Eranian
2014-02-26  8:57     ` Yan, Zheng
2014-02-26 16:03     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-26 18:55       ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-26 18:59         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-26 19:19           ` David Ahern
2014-02-26 19:25             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-26 20:14               ` David Ahern
2014-02-26 20:26                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-09 11:48                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 16:48                     ` Andi Kleen
2014-04-09 17:40                       ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2014-02-26 20:32                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-26 20:53                 ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-26 21:15                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-26 21:33                     ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-26 21:34                   ` David Ahern
2014-02-26 21:42                     ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-27  9:09                       ` Stephane Eranian
2014-02-27 12:35           ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-27 16:08             ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140409174024.GB22728@two.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.