From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 01:14:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:41695 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6822287AbaDIXOTIJrMW (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 01:14:19 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2014 16:13:55 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,829,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="518026294" Received: from wfg-t420.sh.intel.com ([10.239.197.51]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2014 16:13:46 -0700 Received: from wfg by wfg-t420.sh.intel.com with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WY1gf-0002Vd-Eh; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:13:45 +0800 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:13:45 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu To: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Florian Lohoff , Michal Marek , kbuild-all@01.org, "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" Subject: Re: arch/mips/sgi-ip22/Platform:29: *** gcc doesn't support needed option -mr10k-cache-barrier=store. Stop. Message-ID: <20140409231345.GC8370@localhost> References: <534138d9.RISUZQYUMS8U8s42%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20140409051929.GA29246@localhost> <20140409082445.GC1438@pax.zz.de> <20140409133229.GA22315@alpha.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140409133229.GA22315@alpha.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 39752 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: fengguang.wu@intel.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:32:29PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:24:45AM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Most likely they never made it into gcc upstream but they are > > necessary working around the r10k speculative stores on non > > cache coherent machines like the IP28. > > IMHO the patch went upstream judging from the incremental patches > here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01371.html. > > Iirc it went into 4.4.0. That's interesting. I'm using the cross compiler gcc-4.6.3-nolibc/mips-linux downloaded from https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/ I notice there is also a mips64 compiler. Should I use that? Thanks, Fengguang